Thursday, July 17, 2014

27 in 27: The “done” list

 

27

In honour of my impending 27th birthday I came up with this idea to help “celebrate”. I know 27 isn’t really a big deal, not like 18,21 or 30, but never the less it is a reminder that I am getting older (wiser? smarter? prettier? more fun?) and instead of being a bad thing, it should more positive! In order to do so, I’ve created this list of 27 things I have done in my life thus far; things which are accomplishments, happy times, and things which remind me that with ever year that passes, good things happen.

  1. I graduated High School
  2. I graduated University
  3. I got my drivers license
  4. I’ve bungee jumped
  5. I’ve sky dived
  6. I’ve hiked up the highest mountain in Wales (Mt Snowdon)
  7. I’ve read the entire Harry Potter book series
  8. I’ve run in 4 Mother’s day classics (8km)
  9. I’ve consumed an entire litre stein of beer in Germany
  10. I’ve been on the fastest steel roller coaster in the world (Forumla Rossa)
  11. I’ve been white water rafting
  12. I’ve seen the pyramids in Egypt
  13. I’ve abseiled down waterfalls
  14. I’ve been skiing
  15. I moved (a lot)
  16. I’ve been on a cruise ship
  17. I’ve gone camping
  18. I’ve gone paragliding
  19. I’ve parasailed
  20. I’ve been to Bangkok, Cambodia & Phucket
  21. I’ve travelled through most of Europe
  22. I did a road trip starting in Ireland, into Northern Ireland, Scotland, England & Wales.
  23. I’ve eaten raw sea urchin
  24. I’ve had a piercing (vertical inverse navel piercing) in Amsterdam
  25. I’ve been to 2 concerts (Good Charlotte and John Butler)
  26. I’ve had my wisdom teeth taken out (is this a good thing?!)
  27. I’ve lived for 27 years

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Book Review: Unhinged

Unhinged

Unhinged by A.G. Howard

***Please note: This is the second book in a series and the review for the first book, can be found here. Splintered by A.G. Howard.

Blurb on The Back:

In Splintered, A.G. Howard’s dark reimagining of Alice in Wonderland, Alyssa Gardner was crowned a Queen in Wonderland. Yet she chose to leave her subjects so she could live in the human realm. For a year she’s been trying to be regular Alyssa again, with her boyfriend, Jeb, her newly returned mom, her friends, the prom, and the promise of a future in London.

But Morpheus, the seductive, manipulative netherling who haunts her dreams, won’t let her leave her legacy behind that easily. Neither will Wonderland, which appears to be suffering from her neglect.

Alyssa is torn between two worlds: Jeb and her human life…and the intoxicating wildness of Wonderland – and Morpheus. When those worlds collide and Wonderland starts to invade her “real” life, Alyssa must find a way to keep the balance between the two realms or lose everything she loves.

My Thoughts:

This book ultimately decided what it is about this series that I love and what I hate. What I love is the dark, whimsical, magical and haunting world that is Wonderland and everything in it and what I don’t like is the “reality” aspect and the almost whinging teenager that is Alyssa. I kind of loved her in the first book and started getting really annoyed with her in the second.

I’m still addicted to this series, the first book had me hooked within it’s pages; the second book has me faltering a little bit but I enjoyed it never the less.

I did mention, when reviewing Splintered, that there was an love triangle aspect that was sort of on par with Twilight and the whole Team Edward and Team Jacob. I guess for this book Team Edward would be Morpheus – offering Alyssa an immortal life with some mystery and excitement where as Team Jacob would be Jeb – offering Alyssa a quiet, stable life which is filled with their dreams of becoming artists etc etc. See what I did there? I tried to make the life with Jeb sound a little bit more exciting than it presents itself. Long story short, I’m team Morpheus and I kind of knew that from the very first book but the second book put everything into place for me. I’m drawn toward liking Wonderland and all it’s darkness and mystique; I’m drawn toward the adventure and thrill; I’m drawn toward the seductive and playful Morpheus and long story short, Jeb bores me. Sure, he’s selfless and would do anything for Alyssa and I feel bad for him but BLAH.

Have I digressed? I feel like I’ve digressed a little bit. I didn’t love this story as much as Splintered and I think that has a lot to do with it being set in the “real world” rather than in Wonderland. Was it a good story? Yes, it was great; it added a lot of plot twists and changes to things learned in the first book and I especially loved the cliff-hanger ending. I think it’s a great second book in the series and I still love the characters and so I can’t wait for the release of Ensnared!

Added note: The font is still dark purple and beautiful – I was expecting Dark Blue though!

UnhingedStars

Rating: 4/5 Stars

Kerri

Book Review: Splintered

Splintered

Splintered by A.G. Howard

Blurb on The Back:

Alyssa Gardner hears the thoughts of plants and animals. She hides her delusions for now, but she knows her fate: she will end up like her mother, in an institution. Madness has run in her family ever since her great-great-great-grandmother Alice Liddell told Lewis Carroll her strange dreams, inspiring his classic Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland.

But perhaps she’s not mad. And perhaps Carroll’s stories aren’t as whimsical as they first seem.

To break the curse of insanity, Alyssa must go down the rabbit hole and right the wrongs of Wonderland, a place full of strange beings with dark agendas. Alyssa brings her real-world crush – the protective Jeb – with her, but once her journey begins, she’s torn between his solidarity and the enchanting, dangerous magic of Morpheus, her guide to Wonderland. But no one in Wonderland is who they seem to be – not even Alyssa herself…

My thoughts:

I’m so obsessed with this book.

First of all, my confession is this: I have watched all the variations of Alice in Wonderland movies but I can’t recall ever really reading the book, nor have I read Through the Looking Glass. That being said, I am familiar with both stories and I generally have a good idea of what happens. Personally, I love the Alice in Wonderland story and I’m obsessed with it.

(I just remembered – as a child I had Alice in Wonderland and The Looking Glass on cassette…but I only ever listened to Wonderland and that’s why I know it so well)

When I found out about this book, I had to have it and I had to read it. I kind of love the idea of “what happened next” when it comes to classic books and so forth; sometimes i can end horribly and destroy the mystery of “what happened next” but in this case I really loved it! I loved the spin on the original story and I love the love triangle emerging throughout the book (even if it is a bit Twilight/Bella/Edward/Jacob for my liking). I also love the descriptive detail of the outfits and the style and I find the whole book to be very descriptive in that regard but not in an overly annoying “flouncy” sort of way; it was detail in modest sort of way.

Again, like most books I read, I like when there’s a bit of a twist and you might not necessarily see things coming; it’s those moments when you’re on the verge of your seat because you know something is going to happen or some sort of confession is going to come out and you just have to keep reading until it happens. For me, when I read a book, that’s a great feeling.

I love the beauty of this book, the cover is gorgeous, the font-type and chapter headings are beautiful and the font-colour is a gorgeous dark purple but not in an overbearing sort of way.

Overall, I loved this book and couldn’t really fault it…actually, that’s a lie, I didn’t love that it was set in Texas…it’s such a trivial thing but when I was reading and found that out…it was a little bit disheartening? Again, it’s trivial and other than that I can’t fault the book really!

Splinteredstar

Rating: 4 & 3/4 out of 5

Kerri

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

Book Review: That Loving Feeling

download

That Loving Feeling by Carole Matthews

Blurb on the Back:

Ever wondered what you’d do if your relationship lost its spark?

Juliet Joyce has been happily married for twenty-five years. But with two children who treat the house like a hotel, a mother who’s just moved in and a father who’s announced he’s gay, Juliet and her husband Rick have little time for romance.

Enter Steven Aubrey – last seen twenty-six years ago, when he jilted Juliet on their wedding day. He ignites a passion in her that she though was long gone. But will Steven sweep her off her feet or can Rick rekindled that loving feeling they’ve lost? There’s only one way to find out…

My Thoughts:

Very, VERY, rarely do I find myself hating every character in a book. I think we found a winner here though. Actually that’s a lie, there are one or two characters that aren’t really significant that I don’t mind, but the majority of the characters I hate.

Some are hated because I feel like they were written with the intention of being disliked, but the others are just hated because I personally think they are idiots.

This is a story of a middle aged couple who are essentially going through a crisis of being bored with their relationship which has fallen into a stale sort of comfort zone. It’s a story which I am certain plays out on a regular basis in reality simply because relationships can have their rollercoaster type moments. Unfortunately (fortunately?) I didn’t really connect with the characters as it was very hard to understand where they were coming from. I’m not middle aged and I haven’t been married for 20+ years; it’s hard to sympathise (empathise?) with a character when you can’t really feel what they feel in a situation. That being said, I don’t doubt that I’ve reached a point in past relationships where I’ve felt something along those same lines of stale-comfort-zone.

I liked the story but I didn’t love it and that isn’t a criticism of the writer or the writing style; even the content would be ok, I suppose. My problem is that I have a strong dislike for these types of stories; Happily Ever After by Benison Anne O’Reilly was very similar in content and I hated that simply because you find yourself wanting to scream at the characters because you can see where they are going wrong and want them to know they are making the wrong choices. I guess that’s life really; if I had someone looking in on my life they’d probably have given themselves and aneurism for yelling at me so much.

Did I like the book? I felt it was unnecessarily long and draining but still somewhat enjoyable. I didn’t like the characters even though they had their own little quirks and they were interesting (I just hate them as “people”) but just for once, if I pick up one of these types of books, I want the characters to say “ok, my life sucks, but I’m going to do something to fix it right now instead of looking for a way out; if I’ve tried every possible thing to fix it and nothing works, then we’ll figure out a plan B AND I’ll be honest about it”. But that would hardly making for an interesting story right?

THat loving feeling

Rating: 2/5 Stars

Kerri

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Damn you Dichotomy of Gender

 

b&G

A couple of weeks ago, a catalogue was distributed around the nation in which I live regarding a massive toy sale that occurs every year. Basically, this catalogue gets release around the middle of the year/end of financial year and parents go crazy stock piling toys for Christmas.

I for one love junk mail like this; I love flicking through the pages and seeing all the junk I could buy for myself (because I’m just a big kid at heart) and it’s not just limited to toy catalogues. I pretty much love all catalogues that enter my mail box except for the supermarket ones because I don’t need to see that broccoli is on sale; I don’t care for discounted broccoli but a giant Transformer Bumblebee, that’s a whole different story!

Upon my first flicking through the catalogue, it didn’t take me long to realise there was a huge problem. (For most, this wouldn’t be classified as a “huge problem” but for those of us who actually kind of like the idea of gender equality, it represents a little bit of a blip of the problem-radar).

Obviously, with such a big sale, the catalogue had to be divided into sections. It is this that I had a concern over. This catalogue was divided into the following sections: Pre-School Toys, Girls Toys, Boys Toys, Indoor Activities, Outdoors, Kids wear & More and Moves & Gaming. Now, I understand that with so much content there had to be a way to categorize the toys but I can’t help but serious despise the categorization of “girls toys” and “boys toys” especially because as a child, I would have clawed my way through crowds in order to get to the toys which according to this catalogue are considered “boys toys”.

I despise the fact that toys such as Kitchen and Shopping play sets with Pots, Pans, Groceries and cash registers are classed as girls toys, while power tools and Lego are identified as boys toys.

toys

I will give credit where credit is due and recognize that some toys such as barbeques and some construction play sets were placed under the more ambiguous category of “indoor activities” but included only images of boys playing with these items. Again, credit where credit is due; at least these toys weren’t categorized under male or female play items.

Why do I have such an issue with this? I didn’t really want to write a blog post regarding this catalogue to be honest; it was only after viewing a photo of a friend’s young son playing with a kitchen set that I really felt like I wanted to get my thoughts down. Like I mentioned earlier, half the toys that fall into the category of “boys toys”, I would have loved to play with; there isn’t anything wrong with me, I’m quite confident in my female gender, I love all my girl parts and I just so happen to be attracted to males. I played with lego as a child, I also played with barbie dolls, I loved playing on the excavator truck play equipment at one my schools and I loved playing with playdo in the kitchen type play set I got as a present. While we’re on the topic of toys I had as a child: I hated most dolls and teddy bears, they gave me severe nightmares and still to this day cause me anxiety; I loved ambiguous, non-gender specific toys which gave me room to use my imagination and 9 times out of 10, I just loved the box the toys came in because it meant I go to turn those boxes into whatever my heart desired!

Back on the point; my issue with this catalogue is this: it concerned me that in this day in age we still feel the need to…I’m going to say influence the idea of gender roles. Girls have kitchens, baby dolls, super market play sets and toys which don’t require much construction because their place in society is to be the dutiful, mothering type and need to learn the domestic activities whilst boys on the other hand are geared toward more investigative, constructive, manual labour and adventure roles with toys such requiring more assembly such as Lego,  power tools & action heroes.

What if a child wanted to grow up to be a chef? Kitchen, Kitchenware and fake food all fall into the category of “girls toys”; sorry. What if a girl wanted to become an architect (or at a young age, perhaps she wanted to be a superhero!), Oops, apparently these all require toys which fall into “boys toys”.

I don’t have an issue with any of these toys, all these toys look like a whole world of fun (especially the Lego) I DO have an issue with the LABELS that have been placed on these toys; why in a society that should be moving forward (albeit slower than Australia is moving North) do we still insist on using such archaic labels for children’s toys?

And if you don’t think Children recognize what’s going on because “they are young”. Children aren’t stupid, most of them read or will learn to read and can identify when a catalogue says “boys” and “girls” toys. Give them some credit! They will learn these categories and they will grow and accept this ideology.

 

Kerri

(P.S. My apologies for not having a strong argument; I really didn’t take as much times as I would have liked to really explore this issue and have supporting academic articles, this was more of a ranting opinion more than a substantive argument)

(P.p.s. Why am I apologising? This is my opinion, I take that apology back)